The left should respond to these riots with tough love | Deborah Orr

exchanges instead of blaming the unrest on the left should focus on helping young people in hell do not have to stay in the

What can you do? English judgments are gross and ugly as the riots in English themselves. This is a reaction, but not an answer. First, it is time to recognize that the major flaws of the current system came and apologized to the right and left. The law is the "owner" of economic problems. The left is the "owner" social. Property, I do not mean to blame. However, the right and left to face their own mess, and cleaning. I have my ideas about what the law should do. However, this piece is about what lies ahead.

course, thanks to a highly publicized failure of neoliberalism, there is money around from what it was. All of the left think that, basically, that if only the right that everything would be coughing longer pink. Perhaps, however, the law might be less irritated by the money the state wants to get results if you spent more intelligent and better. This can be done.

is interesting that the riots were more fearful in London, among the young. Course, sucks to be poor in London. But if you are young, and culturally sophisticated enough to have a place to live, then there are free buses to the beautiful parks, great libraries, renowned galleries, museums and all kinds of festivals and events that are not entrance fees. Young people who are fighting for their postcode minute traces, and splitting the culture of street tough who glorify this way of thinking, is in jail and a hell for not having to stay in. They have simply not equipped to release.

Why should it be, when they are forced to make a universal, compulsory and free for 12 years? No doubt, may be because the system is not well afford it? Students participate in all classes and backgrounds well in our schools. And that's the thing. Remember the old saying, "You can lead a horse to water but you can not make it drink"? Education only works if it is appreciated by students and their families. State Schools to wait for students to achieve. Children who want to learn to be protected against children who do not like, regardless of skill level.

This has to change. Schools should stop "exclude" the children and go, "referring" them. Where? No school willing to take "difficult" students, as wonderful. No reference units for students who, in London, however, , offer one or more disciplines, routines and boundaries that children need pests.

have, however, go to the centers of family therapy based on the model provided by the lawyer Camila Batmanghelidjh children in their own problems can be addressed, intensely and with great care, in the context of the whole family.

• Where would the money? Here is the good. The money spent on social services for children, family courts, juvenile justice, contact centers, and a host of other children and youth-oriented projects - which can be reassigned. All services offered by these institutions or charities, can be delivered in the family therapy centers, where children mentors carefully and insist on the cooperation and participation of parents and guardians. The aim would be to return to the integration, giving them the confidence and esteem they need only want to be there.

that schools are part of this work already. Colleges need to offer pastoral care - of course it is - and always will be. But they also need reasonable alternatives when the social or psychological problems dominate the educational priorities, alternatives that do not feel like betrayal, but as the thing to do, as a complex rather than early afternoon. Schools are for education.

course, the argument against what alternatives to school "too good" is that everyone wants their children to go to them. This argument explains that these institutions should be punitive - it used to be called "sin bins". Perhaps the time required of families and households with children had been sent there - several times a week - could mean that parents prefer their children stay in school dominant, and therefore the task of helping to do

Maybe care units should be allowed to drive the family allowance. Perhaps a key to the house should be delivered to the therapy center, Batmanghelidjh said he would be willing to do, for inspection by social workers improvised. Tough love.
However, while schools are a good place to start, because the schools contain nearly all children attending school is compulsory until the age of five. Care units, being mainly focused on family, is also connected to the siblings of children is concerned. But before five o'clock, the attention of the state is voluntary. Sure Start does not reach those who need more help. Perhaps, if you want to be reckless ambition and commitment to high risk of having a child that can host or support without the help of the state, there must be some channels.