วันอาทิตย์ที่ 13 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2554

A London Tory writes of homes and families

Chartered Surveyor John Moss

competition in the electoral district of the Assembly of the City of London and East London next year. Conservative Home, asks:

why families break down? Why not even form in the first place? What led to this type of behavior in disadvantaged areas of London and the inner cities of Birmingham and Manchester, which were most affected by the riots? I suspect the answer is in the "slums permissions" massive housing programs of the Council of the 1950s and 60 ...

[A] s the "slum" is dropped, the grandparents are sent to the suburbs to live in "the land of bungalow." Their children were assigned to housing high-rise buildings that their children have grown, they have faced, without gardens, play areas dominated by older teens and overcrowding, which is a characteristic of social housing. This has been recognized by both experts in housing, and Malpas Murray - who curiously had helped to write the chapter on the housing of the obvious post-war work - on his return to the Eastern Conference final re-built and how much damage was discovered made through the implementation demolition and reconstruction massive ....

think we need to rethink how they live in urban areas and the challenge of architects and planners who demand that we live in high-rise, high density housing. We must learn to build houses with gardens for families in urban areas ...

Perhaps the main features include the claim that overpopulation is a particular feature of social housing compared to other types, the suggestion clear that the building programs of the Council of the house are bad and this implies the use of quotation marks deprived neighborhoods ("barrios"), which were demolished to make way as they do not deserve a pejorative term.

'does not fight with Moss version of social history (though perhaps at another time) and is no doubt that the major questions can be asked about the wisdom and social impact of the post-war policy of social housing. But they are just condemn the evils associated with social housing?


Where have you heard this idea before? It is in a pamphlet co-author of two years with Moss, Stephen Greenhalgh, Conservative leader of Hammersmith and Fulham council radical. Principles for Social Housing Reform, published by the local reservoir.

Greenhalgh Moss and tell him that the rents of social housing should be allowed to raise levels of private sector market - the government, of course, agrees - and the higher income that income should be subsidized in a system, the authors argue, would allow the tenants of the house of an enlarged market. They say the main benefit of this would be to break the concentration of deprivation of social housing, thus promoting 'mixed communities' that all political parties to endorse and promote a virtuous circle of self-sufficiency.
Moss



Find best price for : --Earls----Gibbs----Kensington----West----Greenhalgh----Hammersmith----Stephen----Boff----Andrew----Tory----Birmingham----London----Moss--

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น