วันอังคารที่ 29 พฤศจิกายน พ.ศ. 2554

Leveson inquiry: Nick Davies, Paul McMullan, Richard Peppiatt - live





. The Guardian says the investigative reporter of the news media of the world listened to phone messages Milly Dower

. Describe the private detective Glenn Mulcair as "a brilliant Blagg" but he says he has acted as "facilitator"

. States that no longer supports self-regulation of the press

former star apologizes Journal Reporter with the family of Matt Lucas, a former partner and other stories that make up

. Finds that the tabloid journalists were "cannon fodder" for the owners and he was threatened after he started talking

14:17:

Davies explains that if you go on the theme of the story and that person has a public relations consultant, if maneuver margin, will the story with his personal touch and you pull.

Alastair Campbell was "brilliant" in this area, says Davies.

often go to the other side if he is a murderer and is in defense of Reynolds, but he made history by history.

14:17:

Davies is currently discussing the news of the decision not to alert the world of Max Mosley, the history of 'sexual activity prior to publication. Last week, Mosley said he knew nothing until 10 am the day of its publication.

Davies said that if he went to Mosley, "they will get a warrant for reasons of confidentiality."

I disagree

history, but I understand why not go near him.

14:15:

Davies says the Sunday Mirror has bought a kiss-and-tell the story. By alerting the other side involved in the story, the person was able to ban the paper.

Davies says he has his own problems with such stories, but he says he tries to illustrate the research is the "danger" involved in moving the other side.

2:12 p.m. However, there are cases where a journalist is not going the other hand, if we may endanger self-or are not ethical reasons for not seeking comment.

Davies argues that the classic case of a pedophile could be charged with murder and kidnapping, and if a journalist is preparing a background story is wrong and ask for the kidnapping and murder

There is an ethical problem here. Do you ask for the concentration camps of Hitler?

confidentiality and privacy can also be problematic.





14:08:

Davies asked if he agreed he did not put one of his criticism of the person concerned or the relevant documents before his book Flat Earth News was published.

He replied "absolutely not".

said he is currently teaching young reporters and said he wondered if that helps you go elsewhere or not, and says that "most cases" it is.

2:05 p.m.:.

resumed his research Leveson

Davies is now talking about "binology" - a reference to a practice used by a man who sold the Fleet Street stories based on documents found in the deposits from the public

He gives an example of Jonathan Aitken and the information obtained, apparently by Benjamin Pell.

Davies refers to a book written by Mark Watts on Pell, a man known in the trade press as "Benji the Binman."

2:01 p.m.

Labour MP Chris Bryant Twitter is just the BSkyB annual general meeting:

JM tom_watson whether BSkyB if ever paid for private investigators. They study

1:51 p.m.

Alan Rusbridger, editor of the Guardian, Twitter has been through the testimony of Nick Davies.

You can follow him here @ arusbridger

Davies: Mulcair "ease" of piracy. His understanding is that journalists NotW deleted messages Milly Leveson #

1:28 p.m.:.

now have a complete history of James Murdoch for re-election as president at the annual general meeting of BSkyB

13:24:

Here is a summary

Lunch:

. The Guardian journalist Nick Davies said research that journalists of the New World intercepted telephone messages on the dowry of Milly.

. Describes the private detective Glenn Mulcair as "Blagg brilliant", but said he has acted as "facilitator".

. It no longer supports self -regulation of the press.

. Former Daily Star reporter Richard Peppiatt apologized to the family of Matt Lucas, former partners and others for the stories he wrote.

. He told reporters in the tabloids were "cannon fodder" for the owners and he was threatened after he started talking.

13:05:

Search breaks for lunch and Davies will be in the chair after eating. His testimony is expected to continue until 2:45 p.m., when the new features of the publisher of the ancient world, Paul McMullan, appears.

1:01 p.m.

Robert Jay Davies QC said he also refers to a Sunday Times journalist, David Connett, who took the role of a "tribunal. / Aa>

also refers to someone in the Sunday Telegraph in collaboration with Dr. David Kelly, who committed suicide after being discovered as a source for Andrew Gilligan "sexed" Iraq dossier.

Davies said Lord Ashcroft and Lord Levy both had their tax records Blagg by someone who seemed to work for the Sunday Times.

1:01 p.m. Blagg

One expert said he was working for the Sunday Times, but that was the end of 1980, says Davies .

It is one of the above, if you want, you do not like the way everything went.

24:57:

Davies said he was "absolutely clear", known in the money that was going on, there was no clear indication of who was "Z" for the money spent.

He says it's fair to say that the Daily Mail (including former journalists have already been mentioned in connection with "Z") was not the only one to pay for stories.

mail is not alone in their relationship with "Z", as I said, I think it was casual and widespread.

24:55:.

Davies talks about the persecution of "Z" and said that Fleet Street can be held when he was acquitted

When Scotland Yard tried to stop a further rise ... the trial was acquitted ... There was media coverage of crime has been celebrated by Fleet Street. It is fair to say that he was involved in a number of years in business casual, take cash from newspapers to the police.

24:53:.

Davies The new material pointing forward with his story

Davies said he took "note blagging, interceptions advice from voice mail, notes, e-mail interceptions, notes of phone hacking, theft, tracks, and hints of corruption police "

also knew that journalists carry cash for stories and that the police were frustrated because of the active investigation of the crimes were prevented from selling the information.

24:52:

Davies asked about paragraph 271 of his testimony in which he states that in the middle of Fleet Street 1990 was the hiring of dozens of individuals and organizations, including an individual in Ruislip for ex-directory numbers, phone bills and other materials from confidential databases.

Davies said that the individual was brought to trial and Ruislip public information about the case, with the first Motorman investigation, was another source of information.

24:50:

Davies is now talking about an individual "Z", the activities of Scotland Yard tried to stop. He then briefed the court.

Davies says that "Z" has worked on behalf of Fleet Street in the early 1980s until very recently, was still active when the Earth was flat writing news

court says the report, as well as public domain material and human resources were the basis for his stories on hacking the phone.

24:47:.

Breaking News BSkyB annual general meeting

Mark Sweney

see our media business, just Twitter the following:

81.24% in favor of the reelection of Murdoch. Murmurs in the room

and this:

James Murdoch re-election resolution. 18.76% vs

24:45:.

Davies asked if Leveson has access to the raw material of the Information Commissioner had over Whittamore

"I'm not used to answer questions," jokes Robert Jay QC. "Usually, the opposite," said Leveson.

Davies said he only asked because he has access and is surprised that there was no process.

Jay research now confirms that he has seen documents relating to Whittamore.

24:40: ". The dark arts"

Davies speaks on the chapter of his book Flat Earth News called Davies said he uses two reports on the operation Motorman, freedom of information and direct contact with the "two members of the [private investigator Steve] Whittamore network."

said "embarrassed" the Information Commissioner for times more information.

24:39:

Davies

written statement expands the reasons why he felt it would be a violation of privacy to publish a story a former Minister of phone is hacked.

The raw material for the history includes details of the messages were exchanged between him and a friend. I argued that we should not publish the messages - the intrusive, and it was perfectly possible to explain the important point that the Minister was a victim, without violating their privacy

The same type of balance was raised by the history of hacking voice mail Milly Dowler, who took me in July 2011. I was sure it was a matter of public interest which must be revealed, but there was some concern that the publication would violate family privacy Dowler is exposure to advertising more.

24:36:.

Davies explains how to use the Freedom of Information Act on three occasions to extract information on research

24:34:.

Davies now asked about the police investigation into the phone hacking in 2006

He said that the Office initiated the investigation in January 2006 through analysis of phone records of the company. This has produced a wealth of information, but the prosecutor and the police decided not to proceed.

Davies asked how he knows, he answers that "good human source showed me the paper"

24:32:.

Davies said he heard a report from the CPC in November 2009 exempting newspapers phone hacking

The report was terrible, just a huge piece of work. My editor gave the committee of the CPC code editors through it, he went on radio and said, "This is worse than useless"

I do not trust the industry to regulate itself. I report, I want to be free. We deceive ourselves if we think it would work because it will not.

24:31:

Davies said he no longer supports the concept of self-regulation of the newspaper industry. He says the press is not able to keep its own house in order.

The history of the CCP's performance undermines the concept of self-regulation and re-reading of this test, I realized it was sticking up for self-regulation, but I no longer exist.

do not think it's an industry that is interested or capable of self-regulation.

24:28:.
Davies asked if he knew who took the phone Milly Dowler is

He said that the "facilitator" was the private detective Glenn Mulcair. Mulcair was "a brilliant Blagg" and could get the information from the telephone company.

Mulcair said not really hear the same messages - more than has been done by the journalists themselves

If you ask who entered the voice mail of Milly, the answer is that this is one of several journalists and news from around the world that then deleted voice messages.

The moderator was Glenn Mulcair. There is a misconception, I think, how it works.

Not really, in general, do the same thing to listen to the message. Most of what is being done by journalists themselves.

Mulcair worked so they can do when there is a problem because it is a brilliant Blagg, to gather information, data from the mobile phone company.

time to time, I think, special projects only -. I think the royal family would be an example

Davies now speak of the revelations in The Guardian in July 2011 that the phone had been hacked Milly Dowler.

hestitate said about history, particularly the impact it would have Dowler family. However, sending a warning by police in Surrey to the family.

What was so important that we report that we had to find a way to enter the public domain. On the other hand, the family was in hell. We sent a detailed report by Surrey Police to say what is reported.

We did what we could to soften the blow by sending details of warning.

24:23: Davies said the tutor was offered the story of a former cabinet minister, whose voice was hacked. He felt he went too far in terms of violation of privacy. Davies The reporter asked what he thought and he said he felt that the paper should not rebreach privacy has been violated in the first place.

24:22: ". Take out the checkbook"

Davies says he has already competed in the tabloids and he said that getting the first two pages of history, but it gets the chapter.

24:21:.

Davies says he has never paid a source of information and has never been the guardian to pay a police officer for a story

I think it's a practical question. The key you have to do is encourage people to talk to us. The way to do it successfully to build relationships and motivate ... is the most exciting thing of the information.


24:19:

Davies continues:

What I am arguing for journalism did not begin with the facts, there is a trial before selective. What we cover story ... this is very subjective

Davies says, "does not absolve the guardian" problems Peppiatt spoke in terms of single thought about the veracity of a story.

Davies refers to an article in the Guardian ran in 2008 that claimed the charred remains of at least five children were discovered in the basement of the house of a former Jersey children.

Davies, said the visit confirmed that the story does not stand up to examination.

These are problems that arise in all the newspapers - is a story too good to be demolished. The journalist who rang and said, "That's bullshit, there is no evidence at all," will not thank you.

24:12:

Davies explained that the ownership structure of The Guardian, which is a trust, unlike the Daily Star and the type culture created by a single owner, as previously described by Richard Peppiatt.

He adds:

The broadsheets are based much more on advertising for revenue. This is where the roles popular that competitiveness through the ranks ...

broadsheets have less business imperative, which still sell copies, but not as many copies

24:09:. Davies now to another example, three years ago when there was a media blackout on Prince Harry's visit to Aghanistan

Before going to the army, called the Palace of the newspaper and asked for a media blackout.

Press

agreed not to publish, on the basis that if we did, to call down fire on him more and his team and did not want to be responsible.

other hand meant that you took part in a history of public relations: "Harry and the" dogs

24:06:

research lawyer, Robert Jay QC, Davies calls for a concrete example of the difficulties of the public interest. Davies told The Guardian "was a big problem with the hardware of Wikileaks."

Julian Davies persuaded Assange to work with The Guardian, The New York Times and Der Spiegel leaks, but "it soon became clear that it contained information that could make people on the ground in Afghanistan, seriously injured. "

is absolutely clear that he could not publish this information, but it happened.

24:03:

In connection with the public interest, Davies said:

I strongly disagree with the New World was a public interest in publishing the story about Max Mosley's sex life.

24:03:.

Davies

written statement of research has been published

24:01:.

Davies stated in paragraph six of his statement that the notion of public interest can be very "slippery"

in this expansion, said in operational terms is difficult because it is difficult to tell where the lines are supposed to be found.

The answer is that it would be nice if, in the public interest, but are blocked ... someone often difficult and personally I would like to say a public interest organization for advice or a member of the public may participate and may get advice from high quality.

With the advent of a conflict that would be able to provide advice and say "that's what I said." I wish I had something that was important in the case of a dispute .

11:59:.

In paragraph five of the statement of a witness Davies, says The Guardian has a clear code of practice on ethics

The Guardian has its own code and code of the CPC is a party, as an appendix. The NUJ code is less often mentioned, but what is more or less the same.

11:58 pm:

Davies said he accepted that it is frustrating for research that can not talk about their sources of In more detail, which means that will be a gap between what we know and what can be discussed openly.

11:55 pm:

Robert Jay, counsel for the inquiry, however small this line - Davies How many people speak before the validation of claims in his book.

said a dozen for each journal title. "This does not mean that in relation to each count of 12 to 15 sources, but they have more than one."

11:54:

Davies Leveson question "How many people are needed to validate the findings, as opposed to someone who comes and says 'X' and someone says "no, this is not true

Davies said:

I would say that a flexible set of 15 to 20 new journalists around the world who spoke on condition of anonymity for me or for a researcher. They have been an important engine driving the story forward tremenduously.

also says there are half a dozen others in the industry were very important.

There is a third pool of sources - for the victims. There are also private investigators and people "close to the police."

11:50:

He said that one of the first things we look for sources is completely anonymous. They may fear they will lose their jobs, or being beaten.

There is a culture of bullying in some newspapers of Fleet Street - is real.


Davies added: "The interesting thing is the continuation of human resources and persuade them to help you."

He says the former editor of the Sunday Times Harry Evans has his journalists to convince people to continue. If there is ongoing legal action, the judge may order the disclosure that the journalist could help uncover the truth.



Find best price for : --Richard----Jefferies----Jordan----Price----Katie----Gordon----Evans----Harry----Dowler----Murdoch----Yard----Scotland----Mail----Times----Robert----Paul----Peppiatt----Guardian----James----Nick----Chris----Jonathan----Street----Fleet----Leveson----Earth----Flat----Mirror----Sunday----Mosley----Davies----Matt----Star----Daily----Mulcaire----Glenn----Milly----World----News--

ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:

แสดงความคิดเห็น