not surprising that women are attracted to traditional roles, but we must realize that we now have choices and can make history
Sometimes I wonder if, 20 years, therefore, we as a society decides that it makes no sense to award points coveted women in the business of cutting-edge programs, law , the medicine or science. Because by then it will be clear that the vast majority of women who are eligible for these positions - women who are extremely bright and talented - are not really interested in following through their professions and to assume leadership responsibilities. Because it is clear that, having received benefits for 10 to 15 years of training, most women choose to leave, abandon their responsibilities and ensure satisfaction in the traditional roles of wife and mother. In the future, which together could shrug and say, well, just is not working to try to get women on boards or half of the elected officials in government or at the top of any profession. Because women have shown, by their choice, they prefer not to.
hope you do not come to that. All my adult life I have defended women's right to choose their own destiny. The election was the mantra of the women's movement of 1960 and 1970. We now have the freedom to choose so that is unprecedented. Never in history have women had the freedom to shape our destiny, we have now. What's my point. Our decisions are shaping the future - and that these options are replaying the past much more than they are creating a radically new and different future for us all
tend to point fingers at the inequalities that still exist as the reason for women to throw in the towel and give up the leadership of public privacy. Indeed, lack of mentors real, rooted cultural patterns where women still bear the burden of housework and child care, and inappropriate policies around parental leave and child support are important factors. But there is more to the picture -. Rather than resting in the hands of women
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น