UN meeting on the rule of law was just another day of talk | James A Goldston

hope that world leaders face the challenge of instilling justice in the next generation of the Millennium Development

This week, the number of deaths in the civil war in Syria came to 25,000 heads of state gathered at the United Nations headquarters in New York to announce his "solemn commitment ... an order based on the rule of international law "the big party - or, in the UN talks on." High-level meeting on the rule of law at national and international levels "- was an opportunity to promote the human dignity, laying the foundation for economic development, and repair the social contract between the people and governments who have been ripped off by a large part of the world.

But ultimately, world leaders have been disappointing. After more than a year of planning, all I could say was another day of conference. It had to be that way.

back in March, Ban Ki-moon had proposed more. The Secretary General stated that States should firmly commit to an ambitious agenda with detailed recommendations to improve the resolution of international disputes, the empowerment of women and children, strengthening the right to housing and the property, and protection of victims of war crimes.

General requested

clear objectives with benchmarks to measure progress, and ongoing consultation forum - with the full participation of civil society, the private sector and others - to check , maintain and strengthen U.S. policy over time.

In summary, the original vision of the meeting offered the prospect of a real action, the concrete may begin to limit the exercise of arbitrary power. Which may be precisely the reason which caused strong opposition from political leaders determined not to throw the shadow of sovereignty -. Be the Security Council or territory

Although the dynamics of change in world power in the early decades of the 21st century, inequality and political rivalries left a void too large. The lowest common denominator prevailed. There was no consensus on what the law means, let alone how to promote it. The final statement skirted the issue. Can not agree on many things, simply states that the Secretary of - you guessed it - another report

down.

• And yet, despite the distance, high high aspirations fell Secretary-General, the final declaration contained some positive notes.

is kindly "recognize [d] the role of the International Criminal Court" to end impunity, urged States not yet party to consider ratifying the Rome Statute of the Tribunal and "emphasize [d] the importance of cooperation with the court," and to strengthen national mechanisms to investigate and try the perpetrators of serious crimes. He acknowledged the possibility of "voluntary commitments" of individual states - and more than 140 were recorded such promises, although no formal means of control or monitoring. And, perhaps most importantly, the declaration indicates that the rule of law has a role to play in international development agenda post-2015.

This is important, because the Millennium Development Goals (MDGs) - the specific purposes for which States committed more than a decade to make things like the halving poverty and achieve universal primary universal - is to be renewed in 2015

Find best price for : --Indonesia----Yudhoyono----Bambang----Susilo----Liberia----Sirleaf----Johnson----Ellen----Cameron----David----York--