The idea of ??teens actively participate in the political process is nothing more than common sense
ForsythDrumlean As mentioned last week, there are many issues to consider before heavy Alex Salmond is allowed to run the entire United Kingdom giving voice to 16 years simply because it is hoped that Scottish greedy.
"Matters of electoral importance and the extension of the franchise are not issues to be held in the negotiations hole-in-the-corner," said Forsyth, a person who , 16 years old may be interested to know if his Senate seat in a hole-in-the-corner to us, the elderly called "patronage" translated "sponsorship", "buddy", "reward loyalty. "This means that anyone, literally, since even among people over 18 years, voted for autonomy Lord Forsyth, who is a banker in his spare time. Interestingly, although the Party Labour like this system so much that just voted to save him.
But of course Lord Forsyth is right. There are very important questions to answer before age 16 may be invited, as in the electoral process complicated. Are they mature enough? Can you say a part of another? Are they, as some fear, too busy with exams and have many social lives arsed? Same care and stain removal is a priority with teenagers, has been cited as a reason for less than 18 years may have problems, unlike older voters whose skin has been created to reflect sufficiently the case of quantitative easing.
There was a long period of time, between 16 and be then, decades later, get to know some teenagers live, including my own home, when I would have agreed with champions of the status quo. Presumably - knowing nothing - these children 16 were also lost my youngest, but with a growing obsession with his peer group that has been better maintained and rich with unsupervised access to means social
If these conditions are not sufficient to ensure separation teenager extreme, scientists have provided biological reasons to account for their BlackBerry frontal cortex adjustment. The last time there was a significant movement to lower the voting age, Richard Dawkins has explained the potential risks to our current epistocracy adolescent bonce developed. A epistocracy that older voters is known, it is the rule of the wise, with a fully developed brain. In practice, this means that an adult who believes in magic can be health secretary, or an adult can whip tyrant boss, but a student's age, say, Malala Yousafzai, age 14 Pakistani blogger, has not yet acquired the intellectual powers to vote.
In a 2003 article, Dawkins and his co-writer, Elisabeth Cornwell, neuroscientists cited evidence that "the brain undergoes a major overhaul since the beginning of puberty, which continues until 20 years or more. "Crucial, if I understand correctly, is the importance of the further development of the frontal lobes", the same bit that allows us to think abstractly, weighing moral dilemmas and control our impulses. "Without lobe fully developed, for example, our own mayor, superbly equipped open London would not conservatives dedicated man of many families are still waiting to see how the Prime Minister (who is the person who runs the country, children).
was not even clear, say the authors, that teenagers are mature enough "to make life-changing decisions for themselves." This is not news, of course, to all those who are already working to expand children increasingly clear, keeping all adolescents in school until the age of 18, or denying them adequate salaries, or by confining them in the parental home until their frontal lobes are about to explode.
Find best price for : --Elisabeth----Dawkins----Forsyth--
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น