Denzel Harvey might have said "Buttercup" and "puppy." The question is whether he did it with malice
When I opened the paper yesterday, I almost spit out my cereal beep beep in all directions. Bleepety beep, I thought
As a police officer with nearly a decade in the first row, barely a week goes by where someone does not concern me in terms of four letters. I like to think is not a reflection of my style font. Now an appeals court judge ruled that the police are immune from the distress caused by the taking, and Denzel Harvey cleared to do so several times while looking for drugs.
Prosecution Section 5 Public Order Act 1986 have been difficult. Former requires that the previous Section 5 takes place, one third should be "harassment, alarm or distress." When the penalty notice for disorder (PND) were introduced by Article 5, many were revoked when agents do not try the third party. I remember being told by an inspector, no doubt that if someone is swearing or urinating in public, must show the dear old lady who was passing by them in disgust. If our judges Local realized he had an unusually high population of Blandmore dear old ladies, never mentioned. An indication perhaps that the police were over-use and abuse ", section 5 of the POA. " However, Article 5 does not exist to deal with those who understand the F-word in its regular dialogue, but those that cause real alarm and fear in the streets of Britain. The type of drunk grunt crossed the road to avoid
ไม่มีความคิดเห็น:
แสดงความคิดเห็น