your genes, instead of raising, to determine whether it will become a criminal? Adrian Raine thinks so - and to break the taboo on a collision course with the world of science
In 1987, Adrian Raine, who describes himself as a neurocriminologist, left Britain to the United States. His emigration was motivated by two things. The first is a feeling of hitting your head against a wall. Raine, who grew up in Darlington and now a professor at the University of Pennsylvania, he was a researcher of the biological basis of criminal behavior, which, with its echoes of Nazi eugenics, was perhaps the most taboo of all disciplines.
In Britain, the causes of crime were allowed to be social and environmental exclusively the result of disorders or depleted encourage, rather than fatal and genetic nature. To suggest otherwise, as Raine felt compelled to after studying with Richard Dawkins and convinced of "embracing the influence of changing the behavior" was the judge himself to a lack of funding . the United States, seemed more open on the issue and therefore more money to explore. There was another good reason to study first went Raine California had more deadly than there was in the house
When Raine began to brain scans of murderers in American prisons, was one of the first researchers to apply science to the development of brain imaging in violent crime. The most comprehensive study in 1994, it was always bound to be a small sample. He held [positron emission tomography] PET 41 murderers and combines a witness aged "normal" people and a group of 41 similar profile. However limited control, color images showed metabolic activity in various parts of the brain were compared surprising. In particular, the brains of murderers showed what appeared to be a significant reduction in the development of the prefrontal cortex, "executive function" of the brain, compared with the control group.
Understanding advances in neuroscience suggest that this deficit could result in a greater likelihood of a range of behaviors: less control over the limbic system, which generates primary emotions such as anger and rabies, more addiction risk, reduced self-control. and solving problems of the poor, all the traits that may predispose a person to violence
There
Even two decades, they were difficult to publish the results, however. When Raine presented a much less controversial in 1994 to a peer group document, which showed a combination of birth complications and early maternal rejection in infants had a significant correlation with people become violent criminals 18 years later was denounced as "racist and ideological" and depending on the nature
Magazine
was simply stronger than "proof the hype attempts to find the causes social problems Organic will continue. "Similarly, when 15 years ago, at the insistence of his friend Jonathan Kellerman, child psychologist and crime writer, Raine has developed a proposal for a book about some of his discoveries scientists, no publisher touch. This book
The Anatomy of Violence
, an account of 35 years of Raine lucid, factual and provocative study treatment, only now appeared .
The reason for the delay seems mired in ideological enemies. By Raine rigor, discipline "neurocriminology" remains clouded for some, for its association with 19th century phrenology, the belief that criminal behavior results from defects in the organization of the brain as evidenced by the shape of the skull. The idea was proposed by the famous Franz Joseph Gall, who claimed to have identified more or underdeveloped brain "organs" that gave rise to the specific: the organ of destruction, greed and so on, which were identified by the phrenologist by blows to the head. Phrenology was very influential in the criminal law in the United States and Europe in the mid-1800s, often used to support racial and class stereotypes gross criminal behavior.
thought discord was developed in 1876 by Cesare Lombroso, an Italian surgeon, after conducting an autopsy of a serial killer and rapist. Lombroso discovered a deadly hollow brain, the cerebellum would be proposing that violent criminals were more identifiable setback less evolved simian human types by physical characteristics. Political manipulation of assumptions in the eugenics movement was finally discredited and totally forbidden.
Accordingly, after the Second World War, the crime was attributed to economic and political factors, or psychological disorders, but not biology. Driven by advances in genetics and neuroscience, however, that the implications of consensus is increasingly fragile and scientific law - and concepts such as guilt and responsibility -. They are currently being tested
Raine is far from alone in this argument, though his book is readable primer invaluable for science and ethics. As researcher David Eagleman, director of neuroscience and law at Baylor University in Texas, said recently, knowledge in this area has progressed to the point where it is evil to be in denial. What should we do, for example, Eagleman asked that "if you are carrying a particular set of genes, the probability of committing a violent crime is four times greater than it would be if you lack these genes. You are three times more likely to commit robbery, five times more likely to commit aggravated assault, eight times more likely to be arrested for murder, and 13 times more likely to be arrested for a sex crime. The vast majority of prisoners carry these genes, 98.1% of those sentenced to death for ... Can we honestly say that the carriers of these genes have exactly the same range of choices for behaviors that do not and if they do, should be? judged and punished by the same standard? "
Job
Raine
is full of these statistics and types of questions. (One of the most striking results is the extraordinarily high level of psychopathic markers used a temporary work agency studied, it is not surprising to him. "Psychopaths can not solve, they must move, find new stimuli , "he says) is based on a series of studies showing the relationship between brain development in particular -. and damage and deterioration of the extension of the brain -., and criminal Since the defense teams law, particularly the United States, using brain scans and neuroscience as a mitigating factor in judgments of violent criminals and sex offenders. In this sense, Raine create a real public debate on the implications of science for a long time.
Raine was partly attracted by the discipline of his own background. As part of the exploration of their murderers, Raine has also revised its own profile of PET and found a little when he awoke, the structure of his brain seemed to share more features with psychopathic killers with the control group .
quickly laughs when I ask him how he felt this discovery. "When you have a brain scan that looks like a serial killer gives you a break," he said. And there were other factors that has always had a significantly lower heart rate (which he showed to be a more reliable indicator of the capacity for violence, for example, smoking is a cause of lung cancer). He was struggling with chapped lips as a child, evidence of riboflavin deficiency (other marker), born at home, it was a blue baby, all kinds of factors in development problems that may develop their own research alarms
"So," he said, "I was on the spectrum. And in fact, I had some problems. Took me to the hospital for five years to gastric lavage because he drank too much alcohol. From age nine to 11 was pretty antisocial, in a gang, smoking, drop the car tires, setting fire to mailboxes and hard fight, but I was very young. But at this age that I burned somehow. At age 11, I changed schools, I have no more interest in the study and in fact become a different kind of guy. However, when I graduated and thinking "what am I going to investigate?, I looked back at the trials I had written and was one of the best in the biology of psychopaths, I was fascinated by this, in part, I think, because I had always wondered about that lead me soon "
As Raine began to dig deeper, he began to examine the reasons why he became a violent crimes investigator, rather than a violent criminal. (Recent studies also suggest its biology could lead to other races - bomb disposal expert, a business executive or a journalist. - I tend to attract people with these "psychopaths" features) Despite its rare brain structure, it had low IQ is often evident in murderers, or cognitive dysfunction. However, since he worked for four years interviewing people in prison a long time, I thought, that was no longer at his side bars
? Biography
Raine
, so it was a good correction to the attractive idea that our biology is our destiny and that a brain scan can tell us who we are. Even when stacking evidence that people are not free thinkers, rational agents who like to imagine being - completely overcome the limitations imposed by our inherited genes and our neuroanatomy in particular - never forget this lesson. The question remains, however, that if the existence of these "biomarkers" and influence - and you begin to see the irrefutable proof - so what do we do with them
we should perhaps nothing, just ignore them, shall, in respect of the crime, that each individual has the same brain, the same ability to make moral decisions, we tend to do it now. As Raine suggests: "The sociologist would say if we focus on these biological things even recognize us immediately take the eyes of the other causes of criminal behavior - poverty, slums, poor nutrition, lack of education, etc.. All things must change. And this concern is correct.'s why sociologists have struggled this science for so long. "
Raine believes it could be. Even compares this change to our changing perceptions of cancer, until recently, often considered the "default" of the victim due to a characteristic of a repressive nature. "If we buy into the argument that, for some people, factors beyond its control, the factors of their biology, significantly elevated risk of becoming criminals, we can rightly turn a blind eye to it?" Raine question. "Is it really the fault of the innocent baby whose mother smoked during pregnancy had significantly commit crimes, or if she was beaten pillar to another, or even if he was born with a offers abnormally low resting heart rate, hardness must punish what should we say who is responsible? There is, and will increasingly, an argument that is not entirely responsible, so when we get to think of the sentence, we should think more benign institutions prison? "
But there is another consideration that if you start to see crime as a biological disease, which is a feeling of support retributive justice?
Find best price for : --Hyde----Jekyll----Cesare----Raine----Adrian--
